Australians overwhelmingly endorse gay marriage, clearing the way for Parliament to act

Australians overwhelmingly endorse gay marriage, clearing the way for Parliament to act

By A. Odysseus Patrick

SYDNEY — Australians voted to legalize gay marriage by a substantial majority, triggering elation in major cities Wednesday and a rear-guard attempt by conservative lawmakers to enhance legal protections for businesses, organizations and churches that oppose same-sex weddings.


A voluntary referendum conducted by mail found 61.6 percent of Australians in favor of allowing gay couples to wed. Even though the measure was expected to be approved, the size of the win and the unusually large participation of 12.7 million Australians out of the 16 million eligible voters added to its political legitimacy.


Though the vote isn’t binding, all major political party leaders have promised to implement the decision, which would make Australia one of approximately 26 countries that allow gay couples to wed.


“The people of Australia have spoken, and I intend to make their wish the law of the land by Christmas,” Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said. “This is an overwhelming call for marriage equality.”


In a wealthy, urbanized country where 52 percent of the population regards themselves as Christian, according to a census last year, the vote marks a defeat for Australia’s two big churches, the Catholic Church and the Anglican Church, whose leaders were behind a well-organized campaign to defeat the referendum.


Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull addresses the media after the results were announced. “The people of Australia have spoken, and I intend to make their wish the law of the land by Christmas,” he said. (Reuters)

It also demonstrated deep rifts in Australian society. Opposition was concentrated in suburbs with high numbers of working-class immigrants on the suburban fringes, including locations popular with Islamic communities.


[As Australia votes on same-sex marriage, church leaders fight back]


The largest levels of support were found in the wealthy urban hearts of Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Perth.


At Sydney’s Prince Alfred Park, about 1,500 people gathered to celebrate and hear speeches by the organizers of the yes campaign after the results were announced on television.


“Love has had a landslide victory,” a gay politician, Alex Greenwich, said at the park while a popular 1970s Australian song, “Love Is In The Air,” played in the background.


Ironically, one of the biggest majorities in favor of the referendum was in a beachside Sydney district held by former prime minister Tony Abbott, a conservative Catholic and one-time trainee priest who helped lead the “no” campaign.


Deposed two years ago by Turnbull after a series of blunders, Abbott has emerged as the prime minister’s biggest internal critic. He appeared to use the gay marriage vote to energize conservative opposition to his more moderate leader within their center-right Liberal Party.


Commentators said the fairly large majority would bolster Turnbull’s leadership. The prime minister, who said he voted “yes,” was initially criticized by some gay activists for resorting to a referendum rather than just asking Parliament to change the existing law, a move that could have split his party.


But rather than dividing society, the public vote energized both sides, triggered a debate about religious freedoms in a country becoming more secular by the decade, and raised awareness that many gay Australians don’t feel fully accepted, even though same-sex relationships have had the same legal rights as conventional marriages for years.


Factions within the ruling Liberal-Nationals coalition are now arguing over the drafting of a new marriage law.


Conservatives want explicit provisions protecting businesses and organizations that refuse to service or participate in gay weddings on moral or religious grounds. Moderates, with Turnbull’s backing, want the protections limited to churches and marriage celebrants.


[Transgender Australians can choose any bathroom they want, but not everyone is happy about it]


The debate reflects the global influence of the famed case of Colorado baker Jack Phillips, who was found to have violated state law by refusing to create a cake to celebrate a gay wedding. The American said that doing so would violate his religious beliefs. The case is now before the U.S. Supreme Court. The Trump administration has sided with the baker.


Bakeries in Australia would be allowed to display signs saying they do not serve gay couples as a matter of conscience, under the conservatives’ proposal. Parents could withdraw their children from state-run schools that teach them about gay sex, too.


Critics said the measures are unnecessary, in part because of existing laws protecting religion expression and the fact that areas with large numbers of Christians voted for gay marriage, suggesting they don’t feel much threat to their religion practice.


“The churches are misguided because they are putting existing privileges at risk by arguing for an extension of religious privilege, which risks a backlash,” Peter Sherlock, the president of the Melbourne-based University of Divinity, said in an interview.


One of the unusual aspects of the debate was the important role business played. Risking a customer backlash, many large companies publicly endorsed gay marriage. The most prominent was the national airline Qantas Airways, whose chief executive is in a long-term relationship with male ballroom dancer. Alan Joyce, the Irish-born CEO, was criticized by a prominent politician for his advocacy.


Joyce said 50 percent of lesbian, gay, transgender and bisexual people in Australia are uncomfortable revealing their sexuality at work.


“It’s a huge amount of energy, productivity that is being lost because people can’t be themselves at work,” he said, shortly before the result of the vote was announced.